Skip to main content

The Auteur's Debut


There is one thing that every big name director has in common– they all at one point made their first film. In some cases the directors were experimenting, seeing how they could push cinema to its edges, because they had everything to gain and nothing to lose. David Lynch’s Eraserhead is probably the definitive example. Other times, directors make their debut with something safe and mainstream, such as David Fincher’s Aliens 3. The directorial debut can go on to define their careers, such as Kevin Smith’s Clerks, or these films can be completely forgotten- Stanley Kubrick’s Fear and Desire remains virtually unseen. What makes these films special is that their directors do not have a defined style to fall back on, they are usually not receiving funds from studios, and the director is filling more jobs than they would if they had the resources.
This morning I watched Joel and Ethan Coen’s first feature film, Blood Simple. This was before the Best Picture Oscar for No Country for Old Men, before everyone knew the words to the songs from O Brother, Where Art Thou, before True Grit made over one hundred million dollars in box office returns, this is 1984 – Ronald Reagan was president and two brothers from Minnesota released their first movie with a budget of less than two million dollars. This film laid the groundwork for many of their following films. It is the story of a woman (played by Coen Brothers regular and Joel’s wife Frances McDormand) sexually involved with a colleague of her husband. The husband hires a private detective to kill both his wife and the man she is involved with. The detective double crosses and shoots the husband, although he fails to kill him – debuting two more Coen Brothers’ themes, untrustworthy main characters and botched crimes. Most of the film takes place in a run down bar, which is typical for the Coen Brothers, as several of their subsequent films are anchored in seedy locations. Not everything about Blood Simple is a blueprint for further Coen Brothers' films, however, and in a lot of ways it was quite different from all of their following films. For large sections of the movie there is no dialogue, just long drawn out death/struggle sequences. The silence helps to build the tension in the film, and helps to establish it as the directing duo's single horror film.
Blood Simple is merely an example among many that illustrates the value of analyzing a auteur’s early work. To experience for yourself the budding genius of directorial debuts, check out any of the following films.
Coen Brother’s Blood Simple, Danny Boyle’s Shallow Grave, Kevin Smith’s Clerks, David Lynch’s Eraserhead, Darren Aronofsky’s Pi, Mel Brooks’ The Producers, Christopher Nolan’s Following, Quentin Tarentino’s Reservoir Dogs, Rian Johnson’s Brick, Tim Burton’s Pee Wee’s Big Adventure, Mike Nichols’ Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf, Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane, and Sidney Lumet’s 12 Angry Men.

Following film poster.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Actor/Director

When I was a kid I used to watch Home Movies on Adult Swim, a show about kids who try to make movies with a hand held camera. I remember the main character, who was the director, saying at one point that he was going to switch roles with his friend and become the actor, because every director wants to act, and every actor wants to direct. Hollywood keeps proving this statement true. Spike Lee regularly appears in his own movies, Tarantino has done it, Kevin Smith wrote Silent Bob for himself, David Lynch acted in Twin Peaks, Martin Scorsese, Mel Brooks, Woody Allen, Fritz Lang, the list goes on of directors who have appeared in their own films. Then there are those who have had full time jobs as both actors and directors, most notably Orson Welles and Clint Eastwood. Both of them can be studied in either context, and often appear in their own work. But what I’m getting to are the actors, who make it big in Hollywood, and then try their hand at directing. These films are what interest...

I Still Don't Like Spielberg

Sorry. Four years ago I wrote an article about my issues with Steven Spielberg, particularly taking aim at Schindler’s List and AI , mostly from the Kubrickian critique I had developed at the time. As time has passed and I have seen hundreds more films to greater contextualise the man and his work, I decided it was time for a re-evaluation of Spielberg on my part. After all, the age of the “coffee table” Hollywood drama seems to be winding down, as studios continue their unfortunate output of sequels, reboots, and superhero franchises. I sometimes pine for the days when Hollywood at least made an effort and created Oscar bait - independent films dominated awards season this year, with American Sniper being the only studio film nominated for Best Picture. So this week I watched four films I had never seen before from Spielberg’s back catalogue, in the hope of being able to soften my stance towards him. With dĂ©tente declared, I watched Amistad , a film grounded in the little...

South Africa: A Study of History and Film

                                   For a long time now I have had a fascination with South Africa. I cannot say if it is through knowing South Africans, through taking two college courses that focused on South Africa, or just a natural interest aroused by the idiosyncratic nature of the country. The parallels between South Africa and America are well documented – as Robert Kennedy said in 1968, both can be described as a land settled by the Dutch in the mid-seventeenth century, then taken over by the British, and at last independent; a land in which the native inhabitants were at first subdued, but relations with whom remain a problem to this day; a land which defined itself on a hostile frontier; a land which has tamed rich natural resources through the energetic application of modern technology; a land which once imported slaves, and now must struggle to wipe out the last traces of th...