Skip to main content

The Most Powerful Movie Theatre in the World

Being the President of the United States has many perks, such as being able to drop nukes or to have buildings named after you, but perhaps one of the greatest rewards for being the leader of the free world is the White House movie theatre. Here the President can schmooze with foreign dignitaries, and he is just about the only person on the planet who nobody will shush if he talks during a movie. We can learn a lot by finding out what movies these men were interested in. We see the narcissistic nature of LBJ by knowing that his favorite movie was a short biopic of himself, and many Americans were able to connect to President Reagan by watching the movies he had starred in.
Movies like Bedtime for Bonzo .
In 1915 Woodrow Wilson became the first President to screen a film in the White House, showing The Birth of a Nation . The film is a piece of revisionist history that was created to romanticize the American South and to portray blacks as menaces to society. Supposedly Wilson, the first Southern President since the Civil War, stated that the film was like “history written with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true.” In 2012, with a black president, it is hard to imagine a President praising a film that portrays the Ku Klux Klan as America’s saviors, but in 1915 Wilson’s position was not a very controversial one – Birth of a Nation was a very popular film in the silent era, despite the protests that occurred in reaction to it. A permanent movie theatre wasn’t built into the White House until the Second World War, and it wasn’t until President Eisenhower that a true cinephile began ordering films. Eisenhower was a big Western buff, and his favorite was the 1952 Gary Cooper film High Noon. Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, two men who would not agree on much, also both listed High Noon as their favorite film. It has caught the attention of more Presidents than any other film, and it’s not hard to see why. The film tells the story of a retiring Sheriff named Kane who catches news that an old nemesis is returning to town for a showdown. Kane goes around town and pleads with the townsfolk to stand with him to take down this crook, and although the entire town loves and respects him, they cannot be motivated to stand with him. In the end, Kane has to meet this crook and his men alone.
High Noon poster.jpgAlthough the film has had the endorsement of several Presidents, John Wayne hated it and called it completely un-American. He saw it as a veiled nod at the House of Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), the committee responsible for the Hollywood blacklist. Wayne was a supporter of the committee, and he saw High Noon as a story about how many people agreed with the victims of the blacklist but were too afraid to stand with them. The creators of High Noon denied this message, but soon thereafter John Wayne starred in Rio Bravo, which is in many ways the antithesis of High Noon. In 1960, President-Elect Kennedy showed where he stood on the blacklist issue when he crossed picket lines to see Spartacus, which had been written by blacklisted writer Dolton Trumbo. Set in the Roman Republic, the movie makes several poignant allusions to the red scare and McCarthyism, and by publicly watching it he was repudiating the blacklist. Kennedy named Spartacus his favorite film, and would go on to screen it again in the White House movie theatre.
As that example shows, knowledge on Presidential film preferences is not trivial, it is in fact a great insight into the minds of these leaders. Nixon would cite Patton as a guide to how to win in Vietnam, and Reagan announced before a speech that he would send Rambo in to fight the next war. I am not going to wade into discussion about our current president, but you can draw your own conclusions from his favorite movies: The Godfather I & II, Casablanca, and Lawrence of Arabia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Actor/Director

When I was a kid I used to watch Home Movies on Adult Swim, a show about kids who try to make movies with a hand held camera. I remember the main character, who was the director, saying at one point that he was going to switch roles with his friend and become the actor, because every director wants to act, and every actor wants to direct. Hollywood keeps proving this statement true. Spike Lee regularly appears in his own movies, Tarantino has done it, Kevin Smith wrote Silent Bob for himself, David Lynch acted in Twin Peaks, Martin Scorsese, Mel Brooks, Woody Allen, Fritz Lang, the list goes on of directors who have appeared in their own films. Then there are those who have had full time jobs as both actors and directors, most notably Orson Welles and Clint Eastwood. Both of them can be studied in either context, and often appear in their own work. But what I’m getting to are the actors, who make it big in Hollywood, and then try their hand at directing. These films are what interest

I Really Miss Roger Ebert

Note: I originally wrote this article in 2011, and in July 2015 accidentally deleted it. When I reinstated it I decided to revise a lot of it. I find that I miss Roger Ebert whenever a great film is released, as I would love to be able to read his thoughts on films like Birdman or Boyhood. I highly recommend the documentary about his life, titled Life Itself.   The film critic – perhaps, in many ways, the most useless job on the planet. Nobody lives or dies, goes hungry or starves, or makes any important life change whatsoever based on the opinion of a film critic. I decided not to go to film school because I could not see myself doing anything important with a film degree. Most audiences pay no attention to these journalists, and often critics are the butt of a joke for poorly rated popular filmmakers. Still I am very grateful for those who have taken up the occupation – I personally read film criticism and, obviously, write it for my own enjoyment. I am a fan of AO Scott, Peter

I Still Don't Like Spielberg

Sorry. Four years ago I wrote an article about my issues with Steven Spielberg, particularly taking aim at Schindler’s List and AI , mostly from the Kubrickian critique I had developed at the time. As time has passed and I have seen hundreds more films to greater contextualise the man and his work, I decided it was time for a re-evaluation of Spielberg on my part. After all, the age of the “coffee table” Hollywood drama seems to be winding down, as studios continue their unfortunate output of sequels, reboots, and superhero franchises. I sometimes pine for the days when Hollywood at least made an effort and created Oscar bait - independent films dominated awards season this year, with American Sniper being the only studio film nominated for Best Picture. So this week I watched four films I had never seen before from Spielberg’s back catalogue, in the hope of being able to soften my stance towards him. With détente declared, I watched Amistad , a film grounded in the little